ProofOfReturns
Investment claims, checked

Proof over
promises.

The internet is full of confident people with charts. We hold investment claims to the actual evidence — and explain the boring fundamentals the hype skips. No signals, no sponsors, no advice.

The claim

"Gold protects you from inflation."

Worked example — this is the shape of a check, not one we've finished. A widely cited study of this claim concludes gold may work as a hedge if your horizon is measured in centuries, and that over the horizons people actually invest over it is unreliable. A separate dataset reports a positive correlation of 0.34 between gold and inflation since 1972 — that means they tend to move the same way, but far from always — while noting gold was volatile and had a low long-run return on its own. Those aren't quite the same question: one asks whether gold moves with inflation, the other whether you can rely on it to. The explainer that lays both out is published; our own check is next in the queue on the library. Sources for the two findings above. Claude B. Erb and Campbell R. Harvey, "The Golden Dilemma", Financial Analysts Journal 69(4), 2013, pp. 10–42 (doi:10.2469/faj.v69.n4.1; free working-paper version: NBER Working Paper 18706) — quoting the abstract, gold "may be an effective hedge if the investment horizon is measured in centuries. Over practical investment horizons, gold is an unreliable inflation hedge." · Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton, Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2025 (London Business School / UBS, 2025) — the gold–inflation correlation since 1972 is in the free UBS public summary edition, which we read; the full Yearbook is a paid publication and we have not read it.
The proof stacklegend, not a score
$ proven promised

In a finished check the coins are stacked: as many as the promise claims, filled in as far as the evidence carries it. The gap is the hype.

this is the key, not a reading —
no count here stands for gold

This isn't cynicism. It's measurement.

People have been counting for decades — funds, traders, forecasters, influencers. The numbers are remarkably consistent, and remarkably at odds with your feed.

89.5%
of US large-cap funds trailed
the S&P 500 over 15 yrs
97%
of persistent day traders
lost money (Brazil, futures)
56%
of finfluencers are
measurably anti-skilled

See the full story, with sources →